SUBTLE MEDICAL, INC.

Medtech · Private

Machine learning software that detects missing or corrupted brain MRI acquisitions and synthesizes missing images using data from acquired sequences

Grants
$3.0M
6 awards
Sector median: 1
Raised
—
No Form D on record
Contracts
—
No federal contracts on record
Patents
40
11 granted · 29 pending
Sector median: 2

Capital Timeline

Federal above the line · equity below · node area scaled to amount
Capital and federal award history
DateEventSourceAmount
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Low- and Zero-dose Contrast-enhanced MRI Using Deep Learning$185,379
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Low- and Zero-dose Contrast-enhanced MRI Using Deep Learning$742,405
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Low- and Zero-dose Contrast-enhanced MRI Using Deep Learning$755,740
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · Real-time AI-enhanced Low Dose Fluoroscopy$132,173
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Automated enhancement and correction of brain MRI images that leverages the entire imaging exam$299,961
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Automated enhancement and correction of brain MRI images that leverages the entire imaging exam$931,987
Federal grant · SBIR/STTR

Peer position

Medtech · 4531 companies · ranked on federal contract value
Medtech companies ranked by federal contract value
#CompanyContractsDisclosed equity
1837NEUROINDX INC.——
1838NAMI DIAGNOSTICS LLC——
1839ENDOPROTECH, INC.——
1840SUBTLE MEDICAL, INC.——
1841Enable Biosciences Inc.——
1842Irenix Medical, Inc.——
1843CORAMIR BIOMEDICAL, INC.——

Ranked on federal contract value rather than capital raised. The equity column is the comparison worth making — companies at the same procurement position often sit at very different points in their funding history.

Patents

USPTO · 11 granted of 40

Regulatory activity · Medtech

Sector-level, not company-level

Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.