NEUROINDX INC.

Medtech · Private

On-chip functional assay for screening microtubule-binding drug candidates

Grants
$3.3M
8 awards
Sector median: 1
Raised
—
No Form D on record
Contracts
—
No federal contracts on record
Patents
—
No published records under this name
Sector median: 2

Capital Timeline

Federal above the line · equity below · node area scaled to amount
Capital and federal award history
DateEventSourceAmount
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Low-cost microdissection system for live brain cell collection (CTAS-Live)$506,825
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · Noninvasive collection of cell and region specific miRNA from heterogeneous tissues.$190,311
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · Noninvasive collection of cell and region specific miRNA from heterogeneous tissues.$40,000
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Automated Platform for Fixed Tissue Microdissection$265,643
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Automated Platform for Fixed Tissue Microdissection$747,594
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Automated Platform for Fixed Tissue Microdissection$718,448
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · High throughput single cell linear displacement adhesion assay$350,000
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · On-Chip Assay for Identifying Candidate Microtubule Binding Drugs to Treat ADRDs$514,862
Federal grant · SBIR/STTR

Peer position

Medtech · 4531 companies · ranked on federal contract value
Medtech companies ranked by federal contract value
#CompanyContractsDisclosed equity
1834MIZAR IMAGING LLC——
1835ALLERGY AMULET, INC.——
1836GRADIENT MEDICAL, INC.——
1837NEUROINDX INC.——
1838NAMI DIAGNOSTICS LLC——
1839ENDOPROTECH, INC.——
1840SUBTLE MEDICAL, INC.——

Ranked on federal contract value rather than capital raised. The equity column is the comparison worth making — companies at the same procurement position often sit at very different points in their funding history.

Regulatory activity · Medtech

Sector-level, not company-level

Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.