logo
Sign in

MICHIGAN ENGINEERING SERVICES LLC

Ann Arbor, MI · Defense · Private

Real-time thermal simulation software for hypersonic weapon systems using reduced-order modeling

Claim this profile

Follows are private to you and power your alerts

Updated

Sector
Defense
Headquarters
Ann Arbor, MI
Total capital
$18.8M
Federal grants
$3.3M
8 awards · 2015–2025
Rank in peer group#117 of 161
Private capital raised
None on recordNo Form D filings on SEC EDGAR. Some raises are not filed.
Federal contracts
$15.5M
37 awards · Defense, NASA, Homeland Security
Rank in Defense#315 of 1442
Granted patents
None on recordNo USPTO grants. Applications publish after 18 months.

Capital timeline

200520092013201720212025FEDERAL ↑EQUITY ↓Cumulative $18.8M2005: $2.4M across 4 contracts$2.4M2006: $730K across 1 contract2007: $200K across 2 contracts2008: $2.8M across 3 contracts$2.8M2009: $819K across 3 contracts2010: $244K across 3 contracts2011: $99K across 1 contract2012: $657K across 1 contract2013: $943K across 2 contracts2014: $984K across 1 contract$984K2015: $125K across 1 grant · $150K across 1 contract2016: $750K across 1 grant · $1.7M across 4 contracts$2.4M2017: $125K across 1 grant · $100K across 1 contract2019: $1.1M across 2 grants · $1.1M across 2 contracts$2.2M2020: $78K across 1 contract2021: $50K across 1 grant · $100K across 1 contract2022: $140K across 1 grant · $150K across 1 contract2023: $50K across 1 contract2024: $174K across 1 contract2025: $999K across 1 grant · $2M across 2 contracts$3M2026: $50K across 1 contract
200520092013201720212025FEDERAL ↑EQUITY ↓Cumulative $18.8M2005: $2.4M across 4 contracts$2.4M2006: $730K across 1 contract2007: $200K across 2 contracts2008: $2.8M across 3 contracts$2.8M2009: $819K across 3 contracts2010: $244K across 3 contracts2011: $99K across 1 contract2012: $657K across 1 contract2013: $943K across 2 contracts2014: $984K across 1 contract2015: $125K across 1 grant · $150K across 1 contract2016: $750K across 1 grant · $1.7M across 4 contracts$2.4M2017: $125K across 1 grant · $100K across 1 contract2019: $1.1M across 2 grants · $1.1M across 2 contracts2020: $78K across 1 contract2021: $50K across 1 grant · $100K across 1 contract2022: $140K across 1 grant · $150K across 1 contract2023: $50K across 1 contract2024: $174K across 1 contract2025: $999K across 1 grant · $2M across 2 contracts$3M2026: $50K across 1 contract

Latest events

  • Federal contractDefense · Energy Finite Element Analysis (efea) Technical Support$50K
  • Federal grantDefense · Phase II · An Intelligent Assistant For Ship Design Will Be Developed For Designing Hull Forms Of Autonomous Vessels. One Component Of Iasd Is The Incorporation Of Producibility, Which Is Not Adequately Addressed In Current Naval Early-stage Design Tools.$999K
  • Federal contractDefense · An Intelligent Assistant For Ship Design Will Be Developed For Designing Hull Forms Of Autonomous Vessels. One Component Of Iasd Is The Incorporation Of Producibility, Which Is Not Adequately Addressed In Current Naval Early-stage Design Tools.$999K
  • Federal contractHomeland Security · Dhs SBIR 24.1 Phase II Topic 2: Data Labeling And Curation At Scale (dlcs) For Machine Learning Algorithms (michigan)$1.0M
  • Federal contractHomeland Security · SBIR Phase I Topic 2: DHS241-002 Data Labeling And Curation At Scale (dlcs) For Machine Learning Algorithms.$174K
  • Federal contractDefense · Efea Software Technical Support$50K
  • Federal grantDefense · Phase I · Real-Time Simulation of Thermal Protection System in a Hypersonic Environment$140K
Show 38 earlier federal awards
  • Federal contractHomeland Security · Wildland Urban Interface Pdo - Phase 2 Wildfire Augmented Reality App$150K
  • Federal grantDefense · Phase I · Vibration Analysis of Hypersonic Vehicles due to Hypersonic Flow and Engine Excitations$50K
  • Federal contractDefense · Leaps To Efea Tool Development$100K
  • Federal contractHomeland Security · Fire Prevention Toolkit (fpt) Augmented Reality (ar) Application For Wildfire Mitigation SBIR Phase III Award$78K
  • Federal contractDefense · Analytics Set Based Design$108K
  • Federal grantHomeland Security · Phase II · Decision Support Toolkits for Sytem of Systems Level Risk Modeling$1.0M
  • Federal contractHomeland Security · Michigan Engineering - Decision Support Toolkits For System Of Systems Level Risk Modeling$1.0M
  • Federal grantDefense · Phase I · Combat Vehicle Programs: Product Development (PD) Resilience through Set-Based Design Application$108K
  • Federal grantDefense · Phase I · Numerical Methods Combat Power and Energy Systems (CPES)$125K
  • Federal contractDefense · Igf::ot::igf$100K
  • Federal contractHomeland Security · Igf::ot::igf The Purpose Of This Requisition Is To Commit $750,000 For A SBIR Oats Award To Michigan Engineering. The Total Estimated And Total Obligated Funds Are $750,000.$749K
  • Federal contractDefense · Igf::ot::igf Phase I SBIR Contract For Lifecycle Test Optimization.$100K
  • Federal grantDefense · Phase II · Hypersonic Materials Selection and Integration Tools$750K
  • Federal contractDefense · Igf::ot::igf Hypersonic Materials Selection And Integration Tools$749K
  • Federal contractDefense · Igf::ot::igf Engineering Service$70K
  • Federal contractDefense · Igf::ot::igf Hypersonic Materials Selection And Integration Tools$150K
  • Federal grantNASA · Phase I · Fusion of Modeling and Simulation Credibility in Multidisciplinary Design$125K
  • Federal contractDefense · Igf::ot::igf SBIR Phase II OSD12-ER2 Functional Allocation Trades Between Hardware And Software$984K
  • Federal contractDefense · 6 Month SBIR Phase I Trade Allocation Between Software And Hardware$150K
  • Federal contractDefense · Research And Development In The Physical, Engineering, And Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)$793K
  • Federal contractDefense · Research And Development In The Physical, Engineering, And Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)$657K
  • Federal contractNASA · The Design Of An Aircraft Is A Highly Iterative Process. During The Conceptual Design Phase There Is No Time For Developing Detailed Simulation Models And Decisions Are Typically Made Either By Using Low Fidelity Models Or Existing Data And Regression Models. However, The Decisions Made During The Conceptual Design Phase Greatly Affect The Performance Of The Aircraft And The Associated Cost, And Typically The Majority Of The Cost Is Locked During Very Early Stages Of The Design Process. Usually $99K
  • Federal contractNASA · Multi-disciplinary Design Optimization With Uncertainty$75K
  • Federal contractDefense · SBIR Phase I Contract$70K
  • Federal contractNASA · Aircraft Design Is A Complex Process Requiring Interactions And Exchange Of Information Among Multiple Disciplines Such As Aerodynamics, Strength, Fatigue, Controls, Propulsion, Corrosion, Maintenance, And Manufacturing. A Lot Of Attention Has Been Paid During The Past Fifteen Years In The Multi-disciplinary Design Optimization (mdo) Nature Of The Aircraft Design Process. However, A Consistent Void In Aircraft Design Is The Ability To Integrate High-fidelity Computational Capabilities From Multi$100K
  • Federal contractNASA · One Of The Main Attributes Contributing To The Competitiveness Of Rotorcraft, Is The Continuously Increasing Expectations For Passenger Comfort Which Is Directly Related With Reduced Vibration Levels And Reduced Interior Noise Levels. Such Expectations Are Amplified In The Vip Market Where People Are Used In The Acoustic And Vibration Levels Of Civil And Executive Jets. One Of The Most Critical Excitations For Interior Noise In Helicopters Is The One From The Gearbox. Thus, The Structure-borne N$700K
  • Federal contractNASA · Research And Development SBIR Phase III Space Vehicle$20K
  • Federal contractNASA · Hybrid Finite Element Developments For Rotorcraft Interior Noise Computations Within A Multidisciplinary Design Environment One Of The Main Attributes Contributing To The Civil Competitiveness Of Rotorcraft, Is The Continuously Increasing Expectations For Passenger Comfort Which Is Directly Related With Reduced Vibration Levels And Reduced Interior Noise Levels. Such Expectations Are Amplified In The Vip Market Where People Are Used In The Acoustic And Vibration Levels Of Civil And Executive Je$99K
  • Federal contractDefense · Research And Development In The Physical, Engineering, And Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)$749K
  • Federal contractDefense · Research And Development In The Physical, Engineering, And Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)$2M
  • Federal contractNASA · Aircraft Design Is A Complex Process Requiring Interactions And Exchange Of Information Among Multiple Disciplines Such As Aerodynamics, Strength, Fatigue, Controls, Propulsion, Corrosion, Maintenance And Manufacturing. A Lot Of Attention Has Been Paid During The Past Fifteen Years In The Multi-disciplinary Design Optimization (mdo) Nature Of The Aircraft Design Process. However A Consistent Void In Aircraft Design Is The Ability To Integrate High-fidelity Computational Capabilities From Multipl$100K
  • Federal contractDefense · Research And Development In The Physical, Engineering, And Life Sciences$100K
  • Federal contractNASA · SBIR Phase I, Structural Acoustic Simulation In Early Airframe Design$100K
  • Federal contractDefense · 200612!008159!2100!W56HZV!TACOM - Warren !W56HZV06C0569 !a!n! !n! ! !20060918!20080918!134722656!134722656!134722656!N!MICHIGAN Engineering SERVICES,!2890 Carpenter Road !ann Arbor !MI!48108!03000!161!26!ANN Arbor !washtenaw !michigan !+000000364924!N!N!000000000000!AZ12!RDTE/OTHER Research & Development-applied Researc !C9E!ALL Other Supplies And Equipment !000 !not Discernable !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999$730K
  • Federal contractNASA · SBIR 2004 Phase II, Entitled "mltidisciplinary Design Under Uncertainty For Entry Vehicles$599K
  • Federal contractDefense · 200511!004364!1700!N00014!OFFICE Of Naval Research !N0001405C0267 !a!n! !n! ! !20050728!20070725!134722656!134722656!134722656!N!MICHIGAN Engineering SERVICES,!3916 Trade Center Drive !ann Arbor !MI!48108!03000!161!26!ANN Arbor !washtenaw !michigan !+000000080000!N!N!000000000000!AD95!RDTE/OTHER Defense-eng/manuf Develop !S1 !services !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202$743K
  • Federal contractDefense · 200511!004344!1700!N00014!OFFICE Of Naval Research !N0001405C0087 !a!n! !n! ! !20050629!20080731!134722656!134722656!134722656!N!MICHIGAN Engineering SERVICES,!3916 Trade Center Drive !ann Arbor !MI!48108!03000!161!26!ANN Arbor !washtenaw !michigan !+000000067000!N!N!000000000000!AD91!RDTE/OTHER Defense-basic Research !S1 !services !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202$267K
  • Federal contractDefense · 200507!003651!1700!N00014!OFFICE Of Naval Research !N0001405C0146 !a!n! !n! ! !20050404!20070419!134722656!134722656!134722656!N!MICHIGAN Engineering SERVICES,!3916 Trade Center Drive !ann Arbor !MI!48108!03000!161!26!ANN Arbor !washtenaw !michigan !+000000200000!N!N!000000000000!AD95!RDTE/OTHER Defense-eng/manuf Develop !S1 !services !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202$745K

Federal awards are summed by year (45 awards); hover a bar for the split. Form D reports securities sold, which can differ from an announced round; filings are numbered in the order they were made.

Standing among 161 peers

Line = median

Defense · Software

  • Federal grantsBelow median

Cumulative measures favor older companies. Rankings describe position today, not outcome. Below the median, ranks show as a band rather than a number.

Founders and team

No founders are linked to this company yet.

Founders appear once a person is matched to the company through its own patents, grants or filings. We never infer people from social profiles.

Checked: USPTO inventors; federal award principal investigators; SEC Form D related persons · Oct 23, 2026

Claim this profile to add your team

What it has protected

No granted patents are on record.

USPTO usually publishes applications 18 months after filing, so recent applications may not be visible yet. Patents assigned under a different entity name won’t match.

Checked: USPTO granted patents and published applications · Oct 23, 2026

Related companies, and why

Regulatory activity · Defense

Sector-level, not company-level

Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.

Sources

Federal grants from SBIR/STTR, NIH, NSF and DoD records. Federal contracts from USAspending.gov. Private capital from SEC Form D. Patents from USPTO. Publications from OpenAlex. Regulatory activity from the Federal Register. Press matched on company name.

How to read this page

Figures show associations in public records, not causes or predictions. Nothing here is investment advice. An em-dash means no record was found under this company's name, not that none exists.

Data freshness

SEC Form D filings through . SBIR and STTR awards through .