XFIBRA, INC.

Biotech · Private

XFB19, an interference peptide therapeutic targeting C/EBPβ phosphorylation for pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis

Grants
$4.2M
6 awards
Sector median: 1
Raised
—
No Form D on record
Contracts
—
No federal contracts on record
Patents
—
No published records under this name
Sector median: 2

Capital Timeline

Federal above the line · equity below · node area scaled to amount
Capital and federal award history
DateEventSourceAmount
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · Targeting C/EBP-beta Phosphorylation for the Treatment of Lung Fibrosis$316,111
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Treatment Of Lung Fibrosis : Ind Pharmacology And Toxicology$224,967
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Treatment Of Liver Injury And Fibrosis: Safety Pharmacology And Toxicology$214,260
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Treatment Of Liver Injury And Fibrosis: Safety Pharmacology And Toxicology$1,136,111
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Treatment Of Lung Fibrosis : Ind Pharmacology And Toxicology$1,326,982
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · An Agnostic, Host-Direct Survival Cure MCM for Pulmonary Toxicants.$999,601
Federal grant · SBIR/STTR

Peer position

Biotech · 4373 companies · ranked on federal contract value
Biotech companies ranked by federal contract value
#CompanyContractsDisclosed equity
2375Indapta Therapeutic——
2376BIOINVENU CORPORATION——
2377DNP THERAPEUTICS INC—$470K
2378XFIBRA, INC.——
2379ISIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC—$201M
2380MANUS BIO INC—$109M
2381Jaguar Health, Inc.—$146M

Ranked on federal contract value rather than capital raised. The equity column is the comparison worth making — companies at the same procurement position often sit at very different points in their funding history.

Regulatory activity · Biotech

Sector-level, not company-level

Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.