SPEECHVIVE, INC.

LAFAYETTE, IN · Founded 2011 · CIK 0001593767 · Medtech · Private

A wearable/portable device that provides auditory feedback to improve speech volume, articulation, and rate in Parkinson's disease patients, with accompanying telehealth platform for remote programmin

Grants
$1.3M
2 awards
Sector median: 1
Raised
$280K
3 Form D · Apr 2020
78 months since last filing
Contracts
—
No federal contracts on record
Patents
—
No published records under this name
Sector median: 2

Capital Timeline

Federal above the line · equity below · node area scaled to amount
Capital and federal award history
DateEventSourceAmount
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$750,000
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$1,000,000
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Development of a Telehealth Platform for Treatment with the SpeechVive Device$597,381
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Development of a Telehealth Platform for Treatment with the SpeechVive Device$654,719
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$280,000
Federal grant · SBIR/STTRForm D · SEC

Peer position

Medtech · 4531 companies · ranked on federal contract value
Medtech companies ranked by federal contract value
#CompanyContractsDisclosed equity
981Nanosphere Health Sciences Inc.—$24M
982Direct Allergy, LLC—$735K
983ICHOR VASCULAR INC.—$3.1M
984SPEECHVIVE, INC.—$280K
985VIVAQUANT, LLC—$175K
986CHITOGEN INC—$347K
987Happy Cloud, Inc.—$4.5M

Ranked on federal contract value rather than capital raised. The equity column is the comparison worth making — companies at the same procurement position often sit at very different points in their funding history.

Founders & Team

From Form D filings · 7 related persons
  • John HeretigDirector
  • Jessica HuberDirector · Promoter
  • Brian KoppExecutive Officer · Promoter
  • Steve MogensenDirector · Executive Officer · Promoter
  • Connell SeanDirector
  • Bob StoreyDirector
  • Keith WellsDirector

Regulatory activity · Medtech

Sector-level, not company-level

Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.