NANOCAN THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION

Princeton, NJ · Founded 2020 · CIK 0001820532 · Medtech · Private

LIFE gel – a biocompatible, biodegradable liquid immunotherapeutic fiducial eluter administered locally to enable hypo-fractionated radiotherapy for metastatic cervical cancer with sustained immunothe

nanocan.life →
Grants
$1.8M
3 awards
Sector median: 1
Raised
$6.2M
2 Form D · Feb 2025
20 months since last filing
Contracts
—
No federal contracts on record
Patents
—
No published records under this name
Sector median: 2

Capital Timeline

Federal above the line · equity below · node area scaled to amount
Capital and federal award history
DateEventSourceAmount
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$1,125,000
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · Liquid Immunogenic Fiducial Eluter (LIFE) for Cervical Cancer Treatment$400,000
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · Radio-immunotherapy dose-painting (RAID) treatment for hormonal resistant prostate cancer$399,680
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$5,059,984
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase II · Liquid Immunotherapeutic Fiducial Eluter (LIFE) Gel for Cervical Cancer$998,781
Federal grant · SBIR/STTRForm D · SEC

Peer position

Medtech · 4531 companies · ranked on federal contract value
Medtech companies ranked by federal contract value
#CompanyContractsDisclosed equity
802THERAHEART INC.—$12M
803LADERX LLC—$67K
804AVEERA MEDICAL INC.—$8.8M
805NANOCAN THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION—$6.2M
806XCath, Inc.—$5.3M
807Prenosis, Inc.—$1.6M
808Fresenius Medical Care Winter Lake, LLC—$3.6M

Ranked on federal contract value rather than capital raised. The equity column is the comparison worth making — companies at the same procurement position often sit at very different points in their funding history.

Founders & Team

From Form D filings · 3 related persons
  • Eric BroylesDirector · Executive Officer
  • Dave KrasneExecutive Officer
  • Jacques WalkerDirector · Executive Officer

Regulatory activity · Medtech

Sector-level, not company-level

Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.