Moximed, Inc

FREMONT, CA · Founded 2006 · CIK 0001433163 · Medtech · Private

Implantable shock absorber device for knee unloading and pain relief

moximed.com →
Grants
—
No SBIR or STTR on record
Sector median: 1
Raised
$185M
5 Form D · Aug 2024
26 months since last filing
Contracts
—
No federal contracts on record
Patents
40
22 granted · 18 pending
Sector median: 2

Capital Timeline

Federal above the line · equity below · node area scaled to amount
Capital and federal award history
DateEventSourceAmount
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$10,000,000
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$43,269,656
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$19,742,755
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$49,541,720
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$62,712,862
Form D · SEC

Peer position

Medtech · 4531 companies · ranked on federal contract value
Medtech companies ranked by federal contract value
#CompanyContractsDisclosed equity
1743THEIA IMAGING LLC—$160K
1744APOLLO ENDOSURGERY US INC—$176M
1745NANOSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC——
1746Moximed, Inc—$185M
1747IGI TECHNOLOGIES, INC——
1748DAIGNOSTX L.L.C.——
1749APPLIED DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES——

Ranked on federal contract value rather than capital raised. The equity column is the comparison worth making — companies at the same procurement position often sit at very different points in their funding history.

Founders & Team

From Form D filings · 20 related persons
  • David AmersonDirector
  • Robert AndersonDirector
  • Anton CliffordExecutive Officer
  • Robert CroceDirector
  • Ryan DrantDirector
  • Arthur FrankenDirector
  • Christopher GleasonExecutive Officer
  • James LeechExecutive Officer
  • Joshua MakowerDirector
  • Shahzad MalikDirector
  • Matt McAvineyDirector
  • Robert MoreDirector
  • Dan MurrayExecutive Officer
  • John NehraDirector
  • Henry PlainDirector
  • Henry Plain, Jr.Director
  • Christopher ShenDirector
  • Kevin SidowDirector · Executive Officer
  • David van MeterDirector
  • Michael WassermanDirector

Patents

USPTO · 22 granted of 40

Regulatory activity · Medtech

Sector-level, not company-level

Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.