LYST THERAPEUTICS LLC

Columbus, OH · Biotech · Defunct

Monoclonal antibody (LystaMab) that inhibits the LYST protein to prevent post-surgical cardiac adhesions

Grants
$1.5M
6 awards
Sector median: 1
Raised
—
No Form D on record
Contracts
—
No federal contracts on record
Patents
—
No published records under this name
Sector median: 2

Capital Timeline

Federal above the line · equity below · node area scaled to amount
Capital and federal award history
DateEventSourceAmount
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · Targeted LystaMab Therapy to Optimize Tissue Engineered Vascular Graft Performance$222,703
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · Targeted LystaMab Therapy to Optimize Tissue Engineered Vascular Graft Performance$222,703
Federal grant· 1 of 2 same dayDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · LystaMab Immunotherapy to Inhibit Pericardial Adhesions$225,342
Federal grant· 2 of 2 same dayDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · LystaMab Immunotherapy to Inhibit Pericardial Adhesions$225,342
Federal grant· 1 of 2 same dayDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · Development of a LystaMab coated pericardial adhesion barrier$308,896
Federal grant· 2 of 2 same dayDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · Development of a LystaMab coated pericardial adhesion barrier$308,896
Federal grant · SBIR/STTR

Peer position

Biotech · 4373 companies · ranked on federal contract value
Biotech companies ranked by federal contract value
#CompanyContractsDisclosed equity
2814TAMBO, INC.——
2815Diapin Therapeutics LLC——
2816Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc.—$118M
2817LYST THERAPEUTICS LLC——
2818Relation Therapeutics—$116M
2819STEL Technologies, LLC——
2820Passage Bio—$110M

Ranked on federal contract value rather than capital raised. The equity column is the comparison worth making — companies at the same procurement position often sit at very different points in their funding history.

Regulatory activity · Biotech

Sector-level, not company-level

Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.