LASMED LTD LIABILITY CORP

Medtech · Private

Non-invasive diagnostic instrument using selective laser stimulation to measure function of small-diameter nerve fiber subtypes in skin for CIPN assessment

Grants
$300K
1 award
Sector median: 1
Raised
—
No Form D on record
Contracts
$70K
4 awards · Health and Human S
#550 of 4531 in medtech
Patents
—
No published records under this name
Sector median: 2

Capital Timeline

Federal above the line · equity below · node area scaled to amount
Capital and federal award history
DateEventSourceAmount
Federal contractDepartment of Health and Human Services · Igf::ct;;igf Lasmed Limited Liability COMPANY:1187527 [15-011326]$4,280
Federal grantDepartment of Health and Human Services · Phase I · Feasibility Study of New Method of Diagnostic and Prediction of Painful CIPN$300,000
Federal contractDepartment of Health and Human Services · Infrared Diode Laser With An Output Wavelength Of 980 Nm, With Variable Power Control With A Minimum Output Of 0.2 W And Maximum Power Output Of 20 W, Pulse Switching Time Of 10-50 Ms, Has Tti Control, Light Delivered Through A 0.22 Mm Optical Fiber For A Spot Diameter Of 1 Or 5 Mm, Red Light Guiding Light, And Have 2-POINT Safety Override$35,760
Federal contractDepartment of Health and Human Services · Lasmed Limited Liability COMPANY:1187527 [18-016930]$14,000
Federal contractDepartment of Health and Human Services · Lasmed Limited Liability COMPANY:1187527 [22-012580]$15,959
Federal grant · SBIR/STTRFederal contract · USAspending

Peer position

Medtech · 4531 companies · ranked on federal contract value
Medtech companies ranked by federal contract value
#CompanyContractsDisclosed equity
547LUMO IMAGING LLC$74K—
548RHEONIX, INC.$73K$45M
549BIODESIX INC$70K$156M
550LASMED LTD LIABILITY CORP$70K—
551Focus Ventures, Inc.$69K—
552EmergenceMed, LLC$69K—
553PRECISION VISION, INC.$68K—

Ranked on federal contract value rather than capital raised. The equity column is the comparison worth making — companies at the same procurement position often sit at very different points in their funding history.

Regulatory activity · Medtech

Sector-level, not company-level

Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.