KitoTech Medical, Inc.
Seattle, WA · Founded 2011 · CIK 0001611753 · Medtech · Private
microMend, a wound closure device for personal and professional use
micromendskinclosure.com →- Grants
- —
- No SBIR or STTR on record
- Sector median: 1
- Raised
- $16M
- 8 Form D · Jun 2024
- 28 months since last filing
- Contracts
- —
- No federal contracts on record
- Patents
- 20
- 5 granted · 15 pending
- Sector median: 2
Capital Timeline
Federal ↑Equity ↓2013201520172019202120232025
| Date | Event | Source | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private capital raised | Form D · SEC | $100,000 | |
| Private capital raised | Form D · SEC | $1,651,479 | |
| Private capital raised | Form D · SEC | $50,000 | |
| Private capital raised | Form D · SEC | $339,000 | |
| Private capital raised | Form D · SEC | $300,000 | |
| Private capital raised | Form D · SEC | $407,000 | |
| Private capital raised | Form D · SEC | $13,450,315 | |
| Private capital raised | Form D · SEC | $200,000 |
Form D · SEC
Peer position
| # | Company | Contracts | Disclosed equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | KENTUCKY IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | — | — |
| 1951 | Intact Vascular | — | $80M |
| 1952 | BioIntelliSense, Inc. | — | $140M |
| 1953 | KitoTech Medical, Inc. | — | $16M |
| 1954 | Theranos Inc | — | $627M |
| 1955 | NOVAFLUX, INC. | — | — |
| 1956 | Artisight, Inc. | — | — |
Ranked on federal contract value rather than capital raised. The equity column is the comparison worth making — companies at the same procurement position often sit at very different points in their funding history.
Founders & Team
- Ron BerensonDirector · Executive Officer
- Ronald BerensonDirector · Executive Officer · Promoter
- John BrzezenskiDirector
- John CanadyDirector
- Imre EszenyiDirector
- Pat FryDirector
- Michael GruberDirector
- Henry KimDirector
- Cameron PollockDirector
- Jens QuistgaardDirector
- Ed TruittDirector
- Edward TruittDirector
Patents
- Force Modulating Deep Skin Staples And Instrumentsgranted
- Microstructure-based Systems, Apparatus, And Methods For Wound Closureapplication
- Force Modulating Deep Skin Staples And Instrumentsgranted
- Microstructure-based Systems, Apparatus, And Methods For Wound Closuregranted
- Tissue Care Devices Including Microstructuresgranted
- Wound Closure Device For Wide Treatment Areasapplication
- Wound Closure Device With Wide Spaced Microstructuresapplication
- Elastic And Flexible Wound Closure Deviceapplication
- Microstructures To Attach Appliances To Tissuesapplication
- Microstructure-based Systems, Apparatus, And Methods For Wound Closuregranted
- Microstructure-based Systems, Apparatus, And Methods For Wound Closureapplication
- Force Modulating Deep Skin Staples And Instrumentsapplication
Regulatory activity · Medtech
- New Animal Drugs; Approval of New Animal Drug Applications; Withdrawal of Approval of New Animal Drug Application; Change of SponsorFood and Drug Administration
- Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices; Classification of the Skin Patch for Treatment of HyperhidrosisFood and Drug Administration
- Medical Devices; Anesthesiology Devices; Classification of the Monitor for Opioid Induced Impairment of OxygenationFood and Drug Administration
- Medical Devices; Orthopedic Devices; Classification of the Medial Knee Implanted Shock AbsorberFood and Drug Administration
- Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the External Lower Extremity Nerve Stimulator for Restless Legs SyndromeFood and Drug Administration
- Medical Devices; General Hospital and Personal Use Devices; Classification of the Infant Supine Sleep SystemFood and Drug Administration
Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.