Intelligent Fingerprinting Ltd

CAMBRIDGE, X0 · Founded 2009 · CIK 0001540191 · Medtech · Acquired

Non-invasive fingerprint-based drug testing device

intelligentfingerprinting.com →
Grants
—
No SBIR or STTR on record
Sector median: 1
Raised
$23M
9 Form D · Nov 2020
71 months since last filing
Contracts
—
No federal contracts on record
Patents
—
No published records under this name
Sector median: 2

Capital Timeline

Federal above the line · equity below · node area scaled to amount
Capital and federal award history
DateEventSourceAmount
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$3,146,400
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$4,787,744
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$3,039,040
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$3,642,000
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$2,248,000
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$1,454,209
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$2,571,425
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$1,648,487
Private capital raisedForm D · SEC$2,762,451
Form D · SEC

Peer position

Medtech · 4531 companies · ranked on federal contract value
Medtech companies ranked by federal contract value
#CompanyContractsDisclosed equity
1063AKNA HEALTH LLC——
1064Neuraptive Therapeutics, Inc.—$30M
1065Vivamed, Inc.—$3.1M
1066Intelligent Fingerprinting Ltd—$23M
1067Lumier Corp—$50K
1068Blaze Medical Devices——
1069Valencia Technologies Corp—$20M

Ranked on federal contract value rather than capital raised. The equity column is the comparison worth making — companies at the same procurement position often sit at very different points in their funding history.

Founders & Team

From Form D filings · 10 related persons
  • Jay AnthonyDirector
  • David BallDirector
  • Lamar BallDirector · Executive Officer · Promoter
  • Douglas DoughertyDirector
  • Philip HandDirector
  • Michael JohnsDirector · Executive Officer · Promoter
  • John PoldenDirector · Executive Officer · Promoter
  • David RussellDirector · Executive Officer · Promoter
  • Jeremy WalkerDirector
  • Jerry WalkerDirector · Executive Officer · Promoter

Regulatory activity · Medtech

Sector-level, not company-level

Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.