INCLUDEHEALTH, INC.

Cincinnati, OH · Medtech · Private

MSK-OS™, a software platform that autonomously delivers musculoskeletal injury prevention and performance protocols via camera-based motion analysis with real-time corrective feedback

includehealth.com →
Grants
$1.6M
3 awards
Sector median: 1
Raised
—
No Form D on record
Contracts
$715K
2 awards · Veterans Affairs, Defense
#352 of 4531 in medtech
Patents
16
10 granted · 6 pending
Sector median: 2

Capital Timeline

Federal above the line · equity below · node area scaled to amount
Capital and federal award history
DateEventSourceAmount
Federal contractDepartment of Veterans Affairs · Rehbalitation Equipment Igf::ot::igf$22,400
Federal grantDepartment of Defense · Phase I · Open Call for Innovative Defense-Related Dual-Purpose Technologies/Solutions with a Clear Air Force Stakeholder Need$73,453
Federal grantDepartment of Defense · Phase I · Open Call for Innovative Defense-Related Dual-Purpose Technologies/Solutions with a Clear Air Force Stakeholder Need$48,506
Federal contractDepartment of Defense · Innovative Defense-related Dual-purpose Technologies/solutions$692,660
Federal grantDepartment of Defense · Phase II · IncludeHealth TACFI$1,500,000
Federal grant · SBIR/STTRFederal contract · USAspending

Peer position

Medtech · 4531 companies · ranked on federal contract value
Medtech companies ranked by federal contract value
#CompanyContractsDisclosed equity
349LifeCanvas Technologies Inc.$738K—
350PACIFIC OPTICA, INC.$734K—
351TRANSGENOMIC, INC.$732K—
352INCLUDEHEALTH, INC.$715K—
353Konan Medical USA, Inc.$714K$6.0M
354NANODROPPER INC$712K$1.1M
355Aspira Women's Health Inc.$696K$80M

Ranked on federal contract value rather than capital raised. The equity column is the comparison worth making — companies at the same procurement position often sit at very different points in their funding history.

Patents

USPTO · 10 granted of 16

Regulatory activity · Medtech

Sector-level, not company-level

Rules are matched to sector, not to company. Recent activity in a sector is context rather than a signal about this business — until rules are matched to what a company actually builds, the section is shown as context and nothing more.